Model
The intelligence generating the output. GPT, Claude, Grok, Gemini.
You describe the result. AI writes and revises the code. You steer by testing, reacting and asking for changes. You do not need to know every model. You only need the right starting tool for your mission.
SKIP TO MODEL COMPARISONS ↓One plain-English prompt, an agent doing the typing, and a live preview on a local server. It cycles website → game → app on loop. Nobody is touching the keyboard. This is a mock, but it is exactly what your screen looks like.
The point is not to memorize the internet. It is to know which layer you are touching.
The intelligence generating the output. GPT, Claude, Grok, Gemini.
The product where you talk to a model. ChatGPT, Claude, Grok, Gemini.
A code editor with files and a terminal. Cursor, VS Code.
Creates and publishes from plain English. Lovable, Replit.
Plans, edits, tests and continues across multiple steps.
The metered pipe an app uses when it calls a model behind the scenes.
The model guide focuses on OpenAI, Anthropic, xAI and Google. Coding environments are labelled separately by origin.
Choose a goal and budget. The strongest matches light up below.
> TOP MATCHES
PRICE CHECK: A monthly assistant subscription does not include API credits. API pricing is metered separately by tokens.
| Product / current model | Consumer price | Best for | Keep in mind | Official |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ChatGPTGPT-5.6 |
Go $8 · Plus
$20 Pro $200 · Business |
Best all-round starting point: research, files, images, writing and Codex coding workflows. Free resets from Saint Tibo ↗ | Plus and Claude Pro are both $20 USD monthly. Go is cheaper, but it is a lighter plan without full GPT-5.6 Sol access. API billing is separate. | PRICING ↗ |
| ClaudeFABLE 5 / SONNET 5 |
Pro $20 · Max
from $100 Team $25/seat monthly |
Careful long-form writing, patient explanations and agentic coding with Claude Code. | Fable 5 is generally available but may require usage credits. Mythos 5 is limited to approved Project Glasswing customers. | MODEL DOCS ↗ |
| GrokGROK 4.5 |
SuperGrok
$30/mo Lite and Heavy tiers |
Live web/X context, fast-moving news, coding and strong multimodal creation. | Outstanding PR and distribution. Grok Build access and limits vary by plan. | PRICING ↗ |
| GeminiGEMINI 3.5 FLASH | AI Plus · AI Pro AI Ultra |
Google ecosystem work, large files/context and fast agentic workflows. | Paid-plan prices, limits and availability vary by country; Antigravity is the coding layer. | PRICING ↗ |
| Model | Input | Output | Pricing notes | Documentation |
|---|
| Tool / type | Starting price | Best for | Trade-off | Official |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LovableVISUAL WEB BUILDER | Free start Paid credits |
Fast, polished websites and web-app prototypes without managing a local code editor. | Easiest visual route; credit use and complex backend work need watching. | PRICING ↗ |
| ReplitBUILDER + HOSTING |
Starter free Core $25/mo |
Generate, run, host and share an app from one browser workspace. | Core is $20 USD/mo when annual; agents, hosting and integrations draw from credits. | PRICING ↗ |
| CursorAI CODE EDITOR / IDE |
Hobby free Pro $20/mo |
Real codebases, multi-file changes, cloud agents and maximum project control. | Best once you are comfortable with files, terminals and Git. Model usage is metered against the plan allowance. | PRICING ↗ |
| Devin + WindsurfCLOUD AGENT + IDE |
Free · Pro $20 Max $200/mo |
Editor assistance plus autonomous cloud tasks and multi-model access. | Paid Devin allowances cover Devin sessions, Devin for Terminal and Windsurf IDE usage. | PRICING ↗ |
| Grok BuildTERMINAL CODING AGENT |
API
$1
input $2 output / 1M |
Professional repo work, plans, diffs, subagents, skills and local-first terminal workflows. | Grok Build 0.1 has a 256k context window. Consumer access and limits depend on the Grok plan. | DETAILS ↗ |
| AntigravityGOOGLE AGENT PLATFORM |
Included quotas vary by Google plan |
Prompt-to-production work tied to Gemini, AI Studio and Google's developer stack. | Antigravity includes IDE, CLI, SDK and agent-platform surfaces. Check its pricing page for current quotas. | PRICING ↗ |
Provider list price per million output tokens. Lower is cheaper; actual task cost also depends on total token use.
Subscriptions are separate. Provider discounts, caching and long-context rules can change effective cost.
One coding benchmark under the harness and settings reported in OpenAI's GPT-5.6 comparison. Higher is better; limited-access Mythos 5 is intentionally excluded.
Different effort settings, agents and harnesses can materially change scores. Grok 4.5 reports 64.7% separately on SWE-Bench Pro.
No single benchmark tells you which model will feel best. Scores shown here come from provider-published material and are kept in their stated harness and effort settings. Onyx is linked as an independent secondary comparison; official provider documentation remains the source of truth for model availability and pricing.
My best overall pick: broad, approachable and the easiest single place to start.
Excellent for careful writing and code, but second overall for me.
Strong for fast-moving information, X context and xAI's growing coding stack.
> hype radarChatGPT and Grok have the strongest PR
and marketing gravity. That does not automatically make them the
best for every job, but it does explain why beginners hear those
names first.
Best general starting point for questions, files, research and ideas.
Broadest all-round experience and the biggest mindshare. Business and Enterprise are team plans; API billing is separate. Find Out More ↗
Strong for patient explanations, writing and agentic coding.
Claude Code is included in paid plans and shares the same usage pool. Max and Team tiers are for heavier use. Find Out More ↗
Real-time X-native AI with huge public hype and loud model launches.
Very strong PR and social distribution through X. xAI lists plans separately from some X Premium access paths, so verify the exact subscription before buying. Find Out More ↗
Useful for Google-based work and very large context inputs.
Gemini Pro highlights a one million token context window; app limits and AI credits vary by plan and region. Find Out More ↗
Fastest visual route from description to a polished web app.
Free workspaces receive five daily build credits, capped at thirty per month. Paid tiers add more credits and team features. Find Out More ↗
Agent, code, hosting and app infrastructure in one workspace.
Core is listed at $25 monthly, or lower when billed annually. Pro is for heavier collaboration; Agent and hosting work use credits. Find Out More ↗
A real code editor with AI working beside your project files.
Best when you want a real codebase. Pro extends agent/model access; Pro+ and Ultra increase usage headroom. Find Out More ↗
The fastest route to good output is a prompt that already works. Raid these libraries, swap in your details, fire.
Premium hero-section and landing-page prompts tuned for React, Tailwind and Framer Motion.
Pick a template (SaaS, agency, portfolio…), copy its prompt, paste it into your builder. Out comes an animated page. Open MotionSites ↗
Community rule files intended to give coding agents stack-specific guidance.
Find your framework, review the rule file, then adapt it to your project. Community rules can help, but they are not official Cursor guidance and may become outdated. Open Directory ↗
A Claude Code and Higgsfield MCP workflow for generating motion assets, assembling scroll effects and turning the result into a client-ready website.
The useful idea is the production sequence: start with a brand kit, generate purposeful motion, build the page around it, then test pacing, performance and mobile behavior. The revenue and agency-price figures in the post are the creator's estimates, not guaranteed outcomes. Read Zeus's original playbook on X ↗
> advanced example: motion website brief
Build a cinematic, scroll-driven one-page website for
[BUSINESS]. First define the audience, offer and conversion
goal. Use [BRAND COLORS], [TYPE STYLE] and the supplied brand
assets. Create only motion that supports the story: an opening
hero sequence, two scroll-triggered transitions and one
product or service reveal. Keep text readable when motion is
paused. Respect prefers-reduced-motion, compress every asset,
lazy-load noncritical media and provide static fallbacks.
Sections: navigation, hero, proof, offer, process, testimonial
and final call to action. Test keyboard access, mobile layout,
loading performance and reduced-motion mode. Run it locally,
show me the result, then list what you tested and any
remaining risks.
A collection of full-app prompt examples organized around common product types.
Grab the closest example, review it, then swap in your own requirements. Treat community prompts as starting points rather than guaranteed recipes. Open Templates ↗
> example: steal this one
Build me a one-page site for my dog-walking business called Happy
Paws. Style: dark background, one lime accent, bold headline.
Sections: hero, 3 pricing cards ($15 / $25 / $40 per walk), a photo
grid placeholder, and a contact form. Make it mobile-friendly. When
you're done, run it locally so I can see it.
AI-generated code still needs ordinary security review. Check secrets, database policies, authentication and server-side validation before anything real touches the internet. Progress saves in your browser.
Anything in the page's JavaScript is public. Anyone can open dev tools and read it. Keys live on the server or in your builder's secrets panel, never in the page.
Pushing secrets to GitHub, even a private repo, is the #1 way
keys leak. Ask your AI:
is my .env ignored by git?
Without RLS, anyone with your public URL can read every row of every table. Supabase shows a red warning per table. Clear every single one.
Hiding a button isn't security. The server must reject signed-out requests on every route, not just the obvious ones.
If /orders/123 is yours, try /orders/124 as someone else. If it loads, that's the exact bug that has leaked millions of records.
Browser-side checks are suggestions; attackers skip your form entirely. The server re-checks everything it's sent.
Login attempts, AI-calling endpoints, email senders. One person in a loop can drain your API budget overnight.
Logging the whole request object feels harmless until your logging service holds everyone's passwords in plain text.
Your undo button for when the AI confidently deletes something important. Commit early, commit often.
Start with:
Review my app for exposed secrets, missing auth checks, and
missing RLS policies. List concrete fixes, worst
first.
Treat the AI review as a first pass, not a substitute for
testing or expert review.
A small chunk of text. Models count tokens to measure context and API use.
The model's working desk: everything it can consider during one request.
A subscription pays for an app. An API is usually separate, metered usage.
Only when a free limit blocks a real project you already want to continue.
Ask for sources, test code, review actions and never paste secrets casually.
“Make the smallest working version first. Explain the plan and show me how to test it.”
A compact record of how this guide stays useful without pretending fast-moving product information is permanent.
Verified labels record the last manual check. Announced items are not treated as generally available. Link checks run automatically, while price and model changes still require human review.
Currency detection contacts an IP-region service and the Frankfurter exchange-rate service. No account, name or precise location is requested or stored by this page.